Insights: Publications Non-Traditional State Tax Litigation: A Look at Four Pending Cases
Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives (Thomson Reuters/Tax & Accounting), Volume 28, Number 9
State tax litigation traditionally arises in a few standard contexts. Most commonly, state tax litigation follows audit assessments or refund claim denials. Increasingly, however, state tax litigation is arising in other contexts. Perhaps most significantly, tax whistleblower lawsuits have surged over the last 10-15 years in Illinois and New York. Class action attorneys have gotten into the act as well, in some cases filing large class action lawsuits alleging that retailers erroneously collected sales tax from customers. There are a few cases pending in the courts now that cannot easily be grouped into any of the above categories. One involves four states suing the Treasury Department, alleging that federal tax laws are hampering state sovereign tax authority. Another involves fights between Delaware and numerous other states over which state has the right to take custody of certain unclaimed property. Two cases involve taxpayers who have pro-actively sued an out-of-state tax department in a local court. This article will describe and discuss all four cases, noting the central issues in dispute and explaining how in each case the litigation arose. It will close with some concluding observations.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.