Thursday, May 12, 2022
This session includes the following topics:
- Analyzing recent case law developments affecting trademark infringement and counterfeit goods.
- Outlining best practices for building your trademark portfolio and protecting your cosmetics and personal care brands.
- Understanding the increased use of blockchain technology and NFTs in combatting counterfeit cosmetics, especially among the luxury space
- Developing internal controls to protect your brand and reduce counterfeit products.
Thursday, May 12, 2022
In-Person and Livestream
The Harvard Club of New York City (HCNY), 35 West 44th Street, New York, New York 10036
Accreditation will be sought in those jurisdictions requested by the registrants which have continuing education requirements. This course is identified as non-transitional for the purposes of CLE accreditation.
ACI certifies this activity has been approved for CLE credit by the State Bar of California.
ACI certifies this activity has been approved for CLE credit by the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board.
ACI has a dedicated team which processes requests for state approval. Please note that event accreditation varies by state and ACI will make every effort to process your request.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.