Insights: Alerts Sixth Circuit Dissolves OSHA ETS Stay; OSHA Immediately Announces New Compliance Deadlines
For now, however, the ETS has been revived and is back in play. Swiftly following the Sixth Circuit’s decision, OSHA announced new compliance deadlines on its website. Employers now have until January 10, 2022 to comply with all ETS requirements except for the testing requirements, which become effective February 9, 2022. OSHA further stated that it will not issue citations for noncompliance with any requirements of the ETS before the respective deadlines “so long as an employer is exercising reasonable, good faith efforts to come into compliance with the standard.”
As the first deadline is approximately three weeks away, employers who have not already started preparing should begin now. Employers should develop their COVID-19 workplace policy, collect proof of vaccination status of employees, and determine how they will implement the testing requirement for employees who are not fully vaccinated. Kilpatrick Townsend’s Labor and Employment team is available to help employers draft their COVID-19 workplace policy or provide any other assistance they may need to comply with the ETS.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.