1100 Peachtree Street NE Suite 2800, Atlanta, GA USA 30309
Karen Martinez focuses on the design and compliance issues of health and welfare benefit plans. Karen advises employers with respect to the Affordable Care Act, COBRA, HIPAA, MHPAEA, privacy, tax, and ERISA issues with respect to group health plans as well as severance, cafeteria plans, disability, and other welfare plans. She also negotiates service agreements, prepares plan documents, SPDs and employee communications, and advises employers on welfare benefit issues with respect to mergers and acquisitions. Karen is AV® rated by Martindale-Hubbell.*
Advise employers with respect to penalties proposed by the IRS under the Affordable Care Act.
Assisted a large employer in terminating its retiree medical program and preparing the required documentation and communications.
Consolidated the welfare programs maintained by a large employer to ensure consistency and compliance among its various subsidiaries.
Provide counsel to a large employer on day-to-day compliance and design issues that arise with respect to its broad welfare plan programs.
New York University School of Law J.D. (1989)
Dartmouth College A.B. (1986)
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.