Jon Harris is a Senior E-Discovery Attorney with Kilpatrick Townsend’s LitSmart® E-Discovery Team. With significant experience in intellectual property and patent litigation, Jon brings unique expertise to the LitSmart® team. Jon has led all phases of discovery efforts and conducted numerous document reviews in large litigations across a variety of practice areas, including patent, complex commercial litigation and construction litigation matters. In addition, he has negotiated ESI agreements and protective orders, managed document collection and reviews, challenged and defended privilege claims in litigation, and prepared detailed privilege logs. Further, Jon has experience managing third party discovery issues arising out of both domestic and international disputes. Jon routinely employs his technical background to help with the collection, review and analysis of technical documents and discovery involving computer software, prototypes and end products.
As a registered patent attorney, Jon has represented numerous technology companies in litigations in U.S. federal courts and before the International Trade Commission involving mobile device, electronics, energy storage, software, textiles, footwear and chemical products. He has counseled clients on protection of investments in research and development through patents and trade secrets and handled numerous IP issues in business transactions and contract negotiations. In addition, he has defended patents challenged through adversarial proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Jon devotes considerable time to the representation of pro bono clients in a variety of matters. He routinely serves as a Guardian ad Litem for children in contested custody cases and has worked with numerous victims of domestic violence. Jon also supports the legal community by serving on the board for the Legal Aid of North Carolina.
Following law school, Jon served as a law clerk to Judge Karen K. Caldwell of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Prior to joining the firm, he was an associate with a law firm in Lexington, Kentucky.
Represented a large US retailer in a patent infringement and importation ITC investigation brought by American carburetor maker, in its bid against Chinese competitor and downstream equipment- and retailer-customers.
Asserted patents involving streaming audio multimedia technology in ITC investigation seeking to prevent the importation of wireless speakers and other audio systems. Led efforts on foreign and domestic third party discovery.
Obtained complete victory for US footwear and apparel company in a patent infringement and importation ITC investigation related to athletic shoe sole functionality after all respondents ultimately agreed to cease importation of the accused products. Led all aspects of discovery efforts, including collection, analysis, review, and production of documents and ESI.
Insights View All
University of Kentucky College of Law J.D.
cum laude, Order of the Coif
Kentucky Law Journal, Member
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University M.S. (2004) Civil Engineering (Geotechnical Concentration)
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University B.S. (2001) Physics (Astronomy Concentration), Minor in Mathematics
North Carolina (2013)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (2009)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (2009)
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky (2009)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2012)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky - Karen K. Caldwell (Sep 2008-Aug 2009)
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.