Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Names Samuel Hayim an Associate
Washington, D.C. (October 24) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton recently named Samuel Hayim an associate in the firm’s internationally recognized intellectual property department after serving as a Law Clerk at the firm for nearly a year. Mr. Hayim is a member of the firm’s Electronics & Software Team.
Mr. Hayim focuses his practice on patent counseling and prosecution in the software and electronic arts, in particular software development frameworks, control systems, and telecommunications.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Hayim was Patent Examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in Alexandria, Virginia for more than seven years where he assessed patent applications within the software and electrical engineering fields.
Mr. Hayim earned his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center. He received his B.S. in Computer Engineering, with minors in Mathematics and Electrical Engineering, from the University of Arizona.
For more information about Kilpatrick Townsend, please visit: www.kilpatricktownsend.com.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
###
Related Industries
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
