Insights: Alerts European Patent Office COVID-19-Related Extension Period Ends Tuesday, June 2, 2020
Please note: The below information may require updating, including additional clarification, as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to develop. Please monitor our main COVID-19 Task Force page and/or your email for updates.
We previously published an alert that the European Patent Office (EPO), had issued a Notice that extended the times to file papers that could not be filed due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The EPO extended most deadlines accruing after March 15, 2020 until April 17, 2020, including deadlines for international applications under the PCT.
We published an updated alert regarding these EPO extensions, which previously expired on April 17, 2020. The EPO issued a second Notice on April 16, 2020, extending the times to file papers to May 4, 2020. The EPO issued a third Notice on May 1 extending the deadline to June 2, 2020.
The EPO recently issued a new Notice on Thursday, May 27, 2020, that supersedes the EPO’s previous Notices. Practitioners should note that the EPO has decided not to extend the extensions that were previously available for many if not most EPO deadlines due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Practitioners relying on the EPO extensions to extend deadlines falling on or after March 15, 2020, will now have a deadline of Tuesday, June 2, 2020. There are still extensions available if it can be shown that there is a general dislocation of the mail in the applicant’s or representative’s EP place of business (Rule 134(2) EPC), and also on a case by case basis if there is an exceptional occurrence justifying the extension (see, for example, Rule 134(5) EPC and Rule 82quater.1 PCT) but we recommend that extensions available under these provisions should not be relied upon due to the “discretion” involved.
If you are not a qualified European patent attorney, we recommend you work very closely with one, especially if you want to consider discretionary extensions under these or similar provisions.
Andrew T. Serafini, PhD
Theodore G. Brown, III
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.