Eleventh Circuit grants en banc review to resolve controversial TCPA standing ruling
We have written about the Eleventh Circuit’s controversial ruling in Salcedo v. Hanna, 936 F.3d 1162 (11th Cir. 2019). See Eleventh Circuit reinvigorates Spokeo in single text message TCPA case (Sep. 11, 2019). In Salcedo, the Eleventh Circuit concluded that receipt of a single, unsolicited text message did not constitute “concrete injury” sufficient to establish Article III standing, although the ruling was carefully limited to the allegations advanced in that case (the receipt of a single, unsolicited text message). The Salcedo decision has never been endorsed by another federal appellate court.
In the Eleventh Circuit, however, Salcedo has not only been followed but arguably extended. In Drazen v. Pinto, 51 F.4th 1354 (11th Cir. 2002), a panel of the Court of Appeals reversed a class settlement and remanded for further analysis of whether a single cellphone call sufficed to trigger Article III standing. See Eleventh Circuit holds that every class member must have standing for a class action settlement to be approved (Aug. 22, 2022).
On March 13, 2023, the Eleventh Circuit vacated the panel decision in Drazen and ordered the appeal to be reheard en banc. Drazen v. Godaddy.com, LLC, No. 21-10199, 2023 WL 2468505 (11th Cir. Mar. 13, 2023). This may portend a full reexamination of the Salcedo decision by the full Court of Appeals, or it may address only whether Salcedo properly should be extended from the “single text” context to the “single call” circumstances of Drazen. At a minimum, we expect many class action plaintiff groups to press the Eleventh Circuit to undo its uniquely restrictive standing requirements as imposed in Salcedo.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.