Welcome to Kilpatrick Townsend’s Digital Assets Regulation Blog. Here we will cover various aspects of digital assets regulation, development, and administration, as well as related topics. Over the last five years, the combined market capitalization for U.S. digital assets has grown from $14 billion to nearly $3 trillion. This tremendous growth has led to increased attention and regulation from regulatory bodies in the United States and across the globe.
Digital assets cover a wide variety of assets. Here, we will primarily focus on cryptocurrency, stablecoin, and central bank digital currency (CBDC). We will also explore the roles and actions of various federal agencies, including the SEC, FTC, CFTC, Federal Reserve, Treasury, Commerce, FDIC, and OCC. Additionally, we will follow legislative developments regarding digital assets as well as meaningful changes in the broader digital assets sphere.
We look forward to continuing to provide in-depth digital assets analysis and frequent updates on U.S. digital assets regulation more broadly. Thank you for taking the time to visit our blog. We are excited to continue this digital assets journey with you.
Return to blog entries : Digital Assets Regulation Blog
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.