12255 El Camino Real Suite 250, San Diego, CA USA 92130
Diego Wu Min focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation.
Prior to joining the firm, Diego was an associate in the Oakland, California office of an AmLaw 100 firm, where as a member of its Environmental/Toxic Tort Practice Group, he primarily handled cases involving chemical and substance exposure.
While attending Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, Diego served as a judicial extern for the Honorable Jane Magnus-Stinson in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. He also participated in the patent externship program of a national pharmaceutical company headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana. Diego was a research assistant for Professor Xuan-Thao Nguyen and the Executive Managing Editor for the Indiana Health Law Review, Volume XIV.
Diego is fluent in Spanish and has basic knowledge of Mandarin Chinese.
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law J.D. (2017) Dean's List
The Pennsylvania State University B.S., Biology (2013)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (2018)
Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California and Nevada, Toxic Tort Webinar Series, Chair
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.