701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 200, Washington, DC USA 20004
Anne Vilsoet is a patent attorney who focuses her practice on the preparation and prosecution of patent applications in the software and electronics industry with areas of focus including fintech, blockchain technologies, and machine learning.
Prior to joining the firm, Anne was in-house patent counsel at a global edge-to-cloud company where she managed a number of patent portfolios. While attending law school, Anne worked as a student associate in the Washington, D.C. office of an international intellectual property law firm where she focused her practice on drafting and prosecuting patents across industries including autonomous vehicles, cybersecurity, and financial services. Anne also served as a staff member of the AIPLA Quarterly Journal.
George Washington University Law School J.D. (2021)
Johns Hopkins University M.S. Materials Science & Engineering (2013) M.S. Engineering Management, Concentration in Nano-Biotechnology
Hamilton College B.A. Physics (2011) Minors in Mathematics, Cinema and New Media Studies
District of Columbia (2023)
Virginia (2021)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2017)
ChIPs, Member
Virginia Bar Association, Member
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
