1302 El Camino Real Suite 175, Menlo Park, CA USA 94025
Wanying Li focuses her practice on patent prosecution and counseling primarily in the area of electronics.
While attending law school, Wanying served as a staff writer for The Advocate Newspaper. Wanying worked with the firm as a summer associate in 2020. She also worked as a summer associate for an international law firm in its Shanghai, China office where she conducted legal and factual research for patent infringement lawsuits.
While attending Cornell University, Wanying was a research assistant in the Organic Robotics Lab and her research focused on developing an affordable assistive robotic hand for patients suffering from hand or forearm disabilities by designing an industrially feasible fabrication method. Wanying also volunteered at the Children’s Law Center in Bronx, New York.
Wanying’s native language is Mandarin Chinese.
Cornell University M.S., Materials Science and Engineering (2017)
Purdue University B.S., Materials Science and Engineering (2014)
Purdue University B.S., Accounting and Management (2014)
Santa Clara University School of Law J.D. (2021)
California (2021)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, under Limited Recognition
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
