Sarah Holland focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation, enforcement, and clearance matters. She has experience litigating in federal courts and before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
Prior to joining the firm, Sarah worked as an intellectual property associate in the Atlanta, Georgia office of a national law firm where she focused her practice on trademark, copyright, and patent matters.
While attending law school, Sarah served as Research Editor of the Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy.
*Assisted in the representation of a luxury candy company in district court with respect to trademark, trade dress, copyright, and patent claims.
*Helped obtain summary judgment in a trademark infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
*Experience gained by attorney prior to joining Kilpatrick Townsend
Duke Law School J.D. (2016)
University of Georgia B.A. (2013) Digital and Broadcast Journalism, B.A. Political Science, magna cum laude, with honors
Georgia Court of Appeals
Supreme Court of Georgia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Georgia Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.