Two Embarcadero Center Suite 1900, San Francisco, CA USA 94111
Kevin Bastian has been with the firm for more than 20 years and focuses his practice on various areas of intellectual property law with clients ranging from academic institutions to large pharmaceutical companies. He has counseled clients and prosecuted patents in many technical areas including immunology, plant molecular biology, glycobiology, cell cycle regulation and drug discovery. He regularly assists clients with patent portfolio management, patent prosecution, interference strategy, due diligence reviews, freedom to operate analyses, validity and infringement opinions and technology licensing.
Mr. Bastian has held a position as a researcher at Arco's Plant Cell Research Institute in Dublin, California and as a biologist at the Marine Research Center in Emeryville, California.
University of California, Berkeley J.D. (1989)
San Jose State University M.A. (1982) Biology
University of California, Berkeley A.B. (1978) Botany
California (inactive) (1989)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (1989)
American Intellectual Property Law Association, Member
San Francisco Intellectual Property Law Association, Member
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.