Wade Barron focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation matters.
Prior to joining the firm, Wade was a judicial clerk for the Honorable Jill A. Pryor in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta, Georgia where he drafted opinions for civil and criminal cases, prepared bench memoranda, and researched legal issues. Previously, he was a judicial clerk for the Honorable R. Stan Baker in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in Savannah, Georgia where he drafted and reviewed orders for civil cases, researched legal issues, assisted in courtroom proceedings, and communicated with counsel regarding case management and procedural requirements.
While attending University of Georgia School of Law, Wade served as an Editorial Board Member and then Co-Executive Articles Editor for the Georgia Law Review. He also worked as a summer intern in 2018 at a law firm based in Dalton, Georgia.
University of Georgia School of Law J.D. (2019) summa cum laude, Order of the Coif
University of Georgia B.A., Journalism (2015) summa cum laude, with honors
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - Honorable Jill A. Pryor (Aug 2021-Aug 2022)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia - Honorable R. Stan Baker (Sep 2019-Aug 2021)
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.