Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Adds Sarah Glendon to San Francisco Office
SAN FRANCISCO (August 4) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the addition of Sarah Glendon as an Associate in the San Francisco office. Ms. Glendon joins the Complex Commercial Litigation Team.
Ms. Glendon focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation disputes in a diverse range of industries, including agricultural biotechnology, automotive, pharmaceutical, and consumer products. Her practice spans a range of practice areas, including breach of contract disputes, class actions, complex fraud cases, intellectual property disputes, cybersecurity and data privacy, and governmental regulatory matters.
Ms. Glendon earned her J.D., cum laude, from the University of California’s Hastings College of Law and served as Staff Editor of the Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal. While attending law school, Ms. Glendon was a judicial extern to the Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. She received her B.A. in Political Science and Communications from California Polytechnic State University.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.