Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend One of 11 Firms Given Preferred Provider Status by China Ministry of Commerce
ATLANTA (December 7) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today that the firm was one of 11 foreign law firms given “preferred provider” status by the People’s Republic of China Ministry of Commerce (Mofcom). The firms were selected after a bidding and screening process for inclusion in the “2021 Ministry of Commerce’s Law Firm Library Bidding Project for Trade Remedy and Trade Barrier and Trade Barrier and US Section 337.” The service term of the project is from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024.
Mofcom is a cabinet level executive agency established in 2003. It is responsible for trade negotiations and the relationship with the World Trade Organization (WTO). Like the U.S. Department of Commerce, Mofcom promotes exports and imports, and coordinates foreign investment. It also handles bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations.
The 11 firms selected as preferred providers were deemed to have the capabilities, professional standards, and relevant experience to provide consulting and legal services including legal analysis, research, and written legal opinions.
Kristopher L. Reed
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.