Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Elects Michael Tse to Partner
SAN FRANCISCO (January 8, 2020) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton election of Michael Tse to its partnership effective January 1, 2020.
Mr. Tse is based in the firm’s San Francisco office. He splits his practice between patent licensing and patent prosecution. Mr. Tse's patent licensing practice focuses on analysis and evaluation of patent assets for licensing, divestures, acquisitions, and litigation. His patent prosecution and counseling practice spans a wide variety of technology areas including computer and neural network architectures, semiconductor manufacturing, fintech security and transaction systems, cloud computing and various software technologies among others.
Prior to becoming an attorney, Mr. Tse has over ten years of industry experience as a design engineer designing a variety of integrated circuit devices including flash memories, server microprocessors, optical networking components, and global positioning systems.
Mr. Tse was recognized as a Northern California "Rising Star" in 2017, 2018 and 2019 for Intellectual Property by Super Lawyers magazine.
###
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
