Insights: News Christopher Caiaccio Joins Kilpatrick Townsend's Labor & Employment Team in Atlanta
ATLANTA (January 16) – Kilpatrick Townsend announced today the addition of Christopher Caiaccio as counsel on the Labor & Employment Team in the firm’s Atlanta office.
Mr. Caiaccio has broad experience working with employers to assist with human resource issues including employment discrimination, non-compete agreements, employment contracts, sexual harassment, wage and hour issues, and independent contractor misclassification. He also regularly advises clients on labor relations matters such as union avoidance, unfair labor practice charges, secondary boycotts, collective bargaining, strike contingency planning, grievance and arbitration, and other matters involving the National Labor Relations Board.
Prior to joining the firm, he was of counsel in the Atlanta, Georgia office of an international law firm where he focused he focused his practice on all aspects of labor and employment law
Mr. Caiaccio earned his J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Tennessee College of Law. He received a B.S., magna cum laude, in International Business from Florida State University.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.