Insights: News Releases Peter Daines Joins Kilpatrick Townsend in Washington, DC
WASHINGTON, D.C. (July 11) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the addition of Peter Daines as an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C., office. He joins the Employee Benefits Team in the firm’s Corporate, Finance and Real Estate Department.
Mr. Daines has experience advising on a range of ERISA and employee benefits issues pertaining to retirement benefits, health and welfare benefits, fringe benefits, and executive compensation, in the various contexts of DOL and IRS audits, M&A transactions, litigation, fiduciary counseling, and plan drafting, design, and maintenance. Prior to joining Kilpatrick Townsend, he practiced employee benefits law in the Jacksonville, Florida, office of an AmLaw 200 firm.
Mr. Daines earned his J.D. and LL.M. in Taxation from Georgetown University Law Center, served as an Executive Editor of The Tax Lawyer, and clerked for the Hon. Carolyn Chiechi of the U.S. Tax Court. He received his B.A. in Law and Constitutional Studies from Utah State University with minors in Mathematics and Sociology.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.