Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Expands Complex Commercial Litigation Team in Atlanta with the Addition of Brittany Nash
ATLANTA (March 28) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the addition of Brittany Nash to the firm’s Atlanta office. Ms. Nash joins the firm as an associate on the Complex Commercial Litigation Team in the firm’s Litigation Department.
Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Nash was an associate in the litigation section of a law firm based in Atlanta, Georgia where her practice included complex commercial litigation.
Previously, Ms. Nash served as a judicial law clerk for Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana and a judicial law clerk for Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Ms. Nash earned her J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School. While attending law school, she was on the Michigan Journal of Race and Law and was Chair of the Black Law Students Association. Ms. Nash received a B.A. in History from Spelman College, cum laude. After graduating from college, she served as a Fulbright Grantee in Yilan, Taiwan and taught Pre-Kindergarten as a Teach for America corps member.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.