Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Ranks Among Top Five Intellectual Property Firms Globally
ATLANTA (May 19) –Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today that the firm has been recognized as one of the top five intellectual property practices globally by Who’s Who Legal 100 2015.
Recognition by Who's Who Legal is based upon comprehensive, independent survey work with both general counsel and private practice lawyers worldwide. Only specialists who have met independent international research criteria are listed. Who's Who Legal is published by Law Business Research Limited. For more information about Who's Who Legal, please visit, http://whoswholegal.com/.
Who’s Who Legal’s recognition follows recent national distinction for Kilpatrick Townsend's Intellectual Property team, including:
- 2015 World Trademark Review National Tier 1 ranking;
- U.S. News - Best Lawyers ® 2015 “Best Law Firms”: National Tier 1 ranking;
- 2015 Best Lawyers in America ®: #1 ranking for total number of attorneys listed for Litigation – Intellectual Property, Patent Law and Trademark Law; and
- Managing Intellectual Property Tier One Ranking for Trademark and Copyright in 2015.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.