Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Adds Attorney Michael Fulks to Firm’s Winston-Salem Office
WINSTON-SALEM (November 9) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the addition of Michael Fulks to the firm’s Winston-Salem office. Mr. Fulks joins the firm as an associate on the Mergers and Acquisitions & Securities Team, in the firm’s Corporate, Finance, & Real Estate Department.
Mr. Fulks focuses his practice on business and finance, securities, and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to joining the firm, he worked as an associate in a national law firm in its Tax and Commercial Law Practice Groups. Mr. Fulks has experience in corporate law, mergers and acquisitions, and income and corporate tax law.
Mr. Fulks earned his J.D. and LL.M. in Taxation from Georgetown University Law Center. While attending law school, he served as a Staff Member and Executive Editor of the Georgetown International Environmental Law Review. Mr. Fulks received his B.A. in English Literature from Washington & Lee University, cum laude.
For more information about Kilpatrick Townsend, please visit: www.kilpatricktownsend.com.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
###
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
