Insights: In The News 'Hyatt 3' Oral Argument And Potential State Tax Implications
On Jan. 9, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt, a case addressing whether state agencies possess sovereign immunity from suit in sister state courts. Based on the oral argument, the justices are keenly aware that there is no textual grant of sovereign immunity, yet also think that a disconnect exists if the states do not have immunity, given that there is immunity for other sovereigns in state courts, plus the states enjoy sovereign immunity in the federal courts of sister states under the 11th Amendment.
Jeffrey Reed's summary of key points from the oral argument, along with a discussion of the potential state tax implications of the case, is available on Law360.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.