Insights: Alerts A Second Chance for a Motion to Amend
The patent at issue describes a method for creating and restoring backups, including block-level and file-level background restoration. In the inter partes review, Veritas filed a response including arguments for limiting the claims to file-level background restoration. In the alternative, Veritas submitted conditional amended claims expressly limited to file-level background restoration. Along with its amendment, Veritas submitted arguments that the newly added features were not described in the prior art and specifically discussed the prior art on which the Board instituted review. Veritas also submitted a declaration to support the arguments.
The Board made no evidentiary determination of the patentability of the proposed amended claims. Instead, the Board concluded that Veritas had not made a requisite showing because it did not “discuss whether each newly added feature was separately known in the prior art.” Slip Op. at 13. The Federal Circuit found that the Board was arbitrary and capricious in denying the motion to amend. “We do not see how the Board could reasonably demand more from Veritas in this case.” Slip Op. at 15.
Somewhat surprisingly, the Federal Circuit made this finding despite having recently granted en banc review in the In Re Aqua Products, Inc. case, which challenges the procedures for amending claims in PTAB proceedings. The Federal Circuit noted this, stating that the “rationale here is erroneous independently of any resolution” in In Re Aqua Products. Slip Op. at 15-16.
John C. Alemanni
Michael T. Morlock
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.